War Images.Some of the photos can be harsh or unpleasant. War is a disgrace, is cruelty, misery, tears and death. But I believe that war must be shown with all its consequences, not as it is often portrayed by the media. On the other hand will try to include pictures that bring us a little closer to the conflict, its quirks and conflicts. Finally will try to add a brief description to each photo for informational purposes. I hope you find this site of interest.
Thank you very much, now I can not devote time for work and personal issues, but when I can get back to work.
In my blog there are more pictures of two wars, if you do not like it or want to see pictures of other wars. google is your friend, I’m not your friend, I explain in my blog what I want. For the rest and proven education in the message I sent you happen to be ignored …. as shit you cited is ignored.
a big kiss
Well, it’s a topic that gives a lot of himself. Speaking of genocide, as may be Armenian during the First World War, the Jewish and Gypsy during the second, conducted by the Serbs in the war in Yugoslavia, Rwanda … just to name a few. All part of a base, committing genociodio countries often accuse the victims of being to blame for the ills of the country. Which is one of the most forgotten genocide, the Armenian, was born of Turkish defeat against the Russians in the Caucasus Front. Needless to say, this is repeated with the Jews, accusing them of being the cause of the German defeat in the First World War. The accusation that say certain groups exert power over other groups to accuse them of being guilty of the evils before cite (unemployment, poverty, hunger) is often a measure or to take power or to remain in. If you teach hatred and fear culaquier person become a murderer and genocidal potential, animals are most dangerous when they are scared … man too, is well known formula either them or us, or kill or get killed. It is very difficult to end the violence, states, countries are now deciding how, when and why violence is exercised and when its citizens can exercise. There is a theory about this called ‘theory of socialization of violence’ that appears in the book Lords of death, dealing Einsaztgruppen Germans who executed a million people in Russia.
Peace does not exist, is a chimera, an invention, there is peace in a neighborhood that is globally impossible, also not interested. A normal person, not violent, can get used to the use of violence in no time (Read Hitler’s soldiers) Governments tell us that violence is good, where and against whom exercise. This can create fear, hatred, or invent a casus belli. True humanism in most developed countries has created nonviolent societies but this may change at any time. The economic factors are leading to wars and genocides and history and this shows us that countries are willing to almost anything to achieve their interests. Finally if NATO, the UN agencies were not joke where certain countries exert veto power and in some cases acts of violence while others look the other way and left to die thousands or millions, and perhaps maybe we could just believe in an improvement, but I doubt this is possible, too economic interest, too lust for power and domination.
I hope that this paragraph has provided you with something, maybe I have digressed somewhat, but I had to write it twice since I will delete and also have a tendency to do.